9/11 Inquiry

Bleier's scenario + Kurt Nimmo on Huge Rucksack Photo

Nimmo's post is a timely antidote for the apparent disinformation currently circulated by the security services and the media. The photo --all over the British media -- made the front page of the New York Times. Yesterday the WSJ referred to the youths as the _bombers_ without qualification as if it were already proved beyond a reasonable doubt. Here we have Nimmo raising the obvious question: how did such reclusive people have access to the most sophisticated explosives and expertise. The WSJ following the lead of the government suggested that they had help from outside. No proof. Simply an assertion or a guess.

As Nimmo suggests, the size of the rucksack is probably not first one a suicide bomber or any bomber would choose for such a mission. What if he was heading for a camping trip?


I'm wondering if it's too early to build a scenario or is this what many have been thinking for days?!
A. It was an inside job. The security services planned and executed it with the knowledge if not the cooperation of the Mossad and the CIA/FBI, etc.
B. Instead of having a cover story in place they figured they'd imporovise. After reviewing security tapes, they decided to use the inquiry by a mother of one of the victims (in all likelihood) to pin it on a Muslim group that happened to be travelling to London. Such a scenario would explain the several days delay in getting the cover story out.
C. Has anyone been able to independently verify the reason the group was in London? Is such an inquiry possible?


Kurt Nimmo wrote:
http://kurtnimmo.com/blog/?p=823
Huge Rucksack for a Ten Pound Bomb
Thursday July 14th 2005, 11:31 am

Here’s a still supposedly released from the CCTV footage showing the demonic terrorist (i.e., patsy) Hasib Hussain “on his way to carry out last Thursday’s Tavistock Square attack,” according to the Guardian. Scotland Yard’s anti-terrorist branch has poured over “5,000 tapes of CCTV footage” and come up with one image for public consumption. Of course, considering how the British government lied about Saddam’s imaginary weapons of mass destruction and Blair’s “intelligence dossier” on Iraq was lifted, word for word, from an American student’s thesis, there is absolutely no reason for us to believe this single frame image means anything at all or is what Scotland Yard tells us it is and not fun with Photoshop. Anyway, let’s for a moment buy Scotland Yard’s assertion this is an image of Hussain “on his way” to kill people at Tavistock Square. Is there a reason this guy would need a huge rucksack (plainly visible in the above image) if he was carrying a mere ten pounds (or less) of explosives? Or maybe Hussain had his dirty laundry in the backpack too. “The explosives appear to be of military origin, which is very worrying,'’ Christophe Chaboud, chief of the French Anti-Terrorism Coordination Unit, explained two days ago. How did a kid from Leeds who stayed in his room reading the Koran get his hands on military explosives? ‘’Either by trafficking, for example, in the Balkans, or they had someone on the inside who enabled them to get them out of a military establishment.'’ Or maybe the military establishment pulled off the attacks. Of course, now that I have said that, I will be quoted on right-winger blogs as an American (or British) hating nutter.

posted by Ronald @ 10:09 AM